- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:03:12 +0900
- To: public-html@w3.org
This decision policy this group is using relies on the W3C bugzilla instance as a means for tracking last-call comments. The W3C bugzilla instance uses the stock upstream bugzilla 3.6 UI, and as has been noted in bug 10525[1], that UI has some accessibility problems. [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10525 The W3C systems team has, in the W3C's set of the templates that drive that UI, already locally fixed a few of the problems that have been reported. By the way, somebody who's more familiar about the details of those locally-fixed problems than me should report them upstream: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla But there are more problems that still need to be fixed. Steve Faulkner has been taking some time to chat with me to help me understand what needs to be fixed, and with further assistance from him and others who have time to help with this, I plan to get the necessary fixes made as soon as possible. In the mean time, I want to note for the record here that the public-html-comments list continues to be a supported means for submitting comments on HTML WG deliverables. I've set up a mechanism for generating new bugs from comments posted to that list, and reporting the bug number back in an e-mail reply to the commenter. Here's an example: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2011May/0013.html So, I would appreciate it if you let others in the wider community outside the group know that they can use the comments list for filing last-call comments, as an alternative to raising bugs in bugzilla directly, and they can be ensured that their comments will get recorded and tracked and considered just as they would be if entered directly in bugzilla. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 06:03:15 UTC