- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:44:16 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12713 Summary: Mapping microdata in RDF (section 5.2) Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org The microdata document includes a separate section (section 5.2) on how the microdata information should mapped on RDF. The specification itself seems to be technically correct and implementable. However, the specification also includes design choices for which I would request a change. The issue is the URI-s generated for microdata attribute values in case those values are not absolute URI-s. The current specifications lead to URIs of the form (using the example in the document) http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/microdata#http://microformats.org/profile/hcard%23:adr%20street-address Using such URI-s for data originating, in this example from a microformat is unnecessary complicated, and puts an extra strain on any RDF representation of the microdata vocabulary. It would also cast the http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/microdata# string as part of that RDF representation for no good technical reason and would make the resulting URI-s either not dereferencable (which is contrary to the requirements set up, for example, in the Linked Open Data community) or would put an extra and unnecessary strain on the w3c server to set up and maintain such dereferencing service. The proposal is to drop the reference to microdata from the URI scheme altogether, yielding, in the case of this specific example, the URI http://microformats.org/profile/hcard#:adr%20street-address The necessary change in the specification is simple. In section 5.2, in the second processing step block, replace 6.5.4 by: 4. Let <em>predicate</em> be <em>s</em> As a further possible simplification, it is also a question why the '#:' scheme is used in the generated URI. While in some cases it may be necessary, the expected majority of cases are of the form, say <span itemscope itemtype="http://microformats.org/profile/hcard"> <span itemprop="street-address">Street name</span> </span> in which case a predicate URI of the form http://microformats.org/profile/hcard#street-address would be much more natural (note the missing ':') character. To achieve that, the following modifications on the specification should be made: Both 4.3 and 5.3 should say: "If the last character of <em>type</em> is not either the U+003A COLON character (:) or the U+0023 NUMBER SIGN character (#), append a U+003A COLON character (:) to type" 5.4 should say: If the last character of <em>type</em> is not either the U+003A COLON character (:) or the U+0023 NUMBER SIGN character (#), append a U+0025 PERCENT SIGN character (%), a U+0032 DIGIT TWO character (2), and a U+0030 DIGIT ZERO character (0) to <em>type</em>. 6.1.5.2 should say: If the last character of <em>s</em> is not either the U+003A COLON character (:) or the U+0023 NUMBER SIGN character (#), append a U+0025 PERCENT SIGN character (%), a U+0032 DIGIT TWO character (2), and a U+0030 DIGIT ZERO character (0) to <em>s</em>. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 09:44:18 UTC