- From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:22:11 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
I see Julian described some of these "link types" about a year ago here [1] but I haven't found any follow up to that thread (dealing with the three "types"). Are there any definitive examples of each type available? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0225.html mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me #RESTFest 2011 http://rest-fest.org On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:44, mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com> wrote: > Henri: > > Thanks for the quick follow-up; that is helpful information. I notice > you already edited the Microformats Wiki to start building a list that > is compliant w/ the HTML5 draft, too. Thanks. > > I am still looking for some feedback on the first part of my query: > that of clarifying the meaning/use of "Hyperlink", "External > Resource", and "Annotation." A pointer to some examples of each would > be fine since that seems to be the only thing missing form the HTML5 > draft at this time. > > mca > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > http://twitter.com@mamund > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > #RESTFest 2010 > http://rest-fest.googlecode.com > > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:37, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:13 -0400, mike amundsen wrote: >>> Finally, I currently know of four registries that contain some level >>> of Link Relation content: >>> IANA - http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xml >>> Microformats - http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values >>> Paramsr.us - http://paramsr.us/link-relation-types/ >>> Dublink Core - http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/ >>> >>> Are there others I have not listed here that should be considered? >>> Should these registries be viewed as a related? a co-operating group? >>> at odds with each other? From the HTML5 POV, should one or more list >>> be viewed as "sanctioned" or canonical while others should be viewed >>> as "rogue" or contrary to standards? >> >> Only http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values is referenced from >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types . Thus, the >> others have no bearing on HTML5. >> >> As for the content of http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values , >> right now the vast majority of the link types documented there are not >> registered with all the data >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types requires >> registrations to have, so the pre-existing content on the wiki that >> doesn't meet the formalities required by HTML5 has to be considered not >> to constitute registrations at this time. >> >> -- >> Henri Sivonen >> hsivonen@iki.fi >> http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 19:22:39 UTC