- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:28:57 -0700
- To: Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
Frank, I have just submitted a bug that includes this: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 Cheers, Silvia. On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com> wrote: > I'd prefer that we still change the spec as proposed in the original ISSUE-147 Change Proposal [1] to make it clear that the user agent might not support the requested rate. Therefore I am not currently willing to withdraw that Change Proposal for ISSUE-147. > > I do agree that adding a metric object should be a separate Last Call issue. Is someone going to file a separate bug for this requirement? > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0113.html > > -----Original Message----- > From: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:23 AM > To: Paul Cotton > Cc: Ian Hickson; Frank Olivier; HTML WG (public-html@w3.org) > Subject: Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-147 > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> Would you object to adding a metrics feature such as you describe at a later date rather than as part of issue 147? >> >> If we got agreement to do this how would it impact the change proposals on the table? > > As an answer to this: I'd be happy to retract my change proposal. > > Cheers, > Silvia. > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 02:29:49 UTC