- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:10:04 +0100
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: lrosen@rosenlaw.com, public-html@w3.org, member-psig@w3.org
On 2011-03-23 00:05, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> Maciej, haven't you been on vacation? :-) >> >> You might want to recheck... > > Sam, can you clarify this. Are you saying that the FSF lawyers have > reviewed the Option 3 license or the MIT license? And if so, that they > concluded that it was GPL compatible? > > If any review of the Option 3 license have occurred and FSF has made a > public statement about it, do you have a link to this statement? We should also check that the licence complies with the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) [1]. I believe the implicit field of use restrictions in the proposed licence would make it incompatible. [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:10:47 UTC