Re: Option 3

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> Maciej, haven't you been on vacation?  :-)
>
> You might want to recheck...

Sam, can you clarify this. Are you saying that the FSF lawyers have
reviewed the Option 3 license or the MIT license? And if so, that they
concluded that it was GPL compatible?

If any review of the Option 3 license have occurred and FSF has made a
public statement about it, do you have a link to this statement?

/ Jonas

Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 23:06:26 UTC