W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

CfC: Close ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet by Amicable Resolution

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:41:42 -0400
Message-ID: <4D89EA86.1040207@intertwingly.net>
To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 02/28/2011 05:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> Since bug 11984 somewhat confused the disposition of this issue, the
> Chairs are granting additional time for counter-proposals or
> additional proposals. The new deadline is March 22, 2011.

As we have received no acceptable counter-proposals or alternate 
proposals, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on the proposal 
that we do have.  If no objections are raised to this call by March 30th 
2011, we will direct the editor to make the proposed change.  If anybody 
would like to raise an objection during this time, we strongly encourage 
them to accompany their objection with a concrete and complete change 

- Sam Ruby

> Regards, Maciej
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> The current status for this issue:
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/145
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-145
>> - We a change proposal to clarify that if
>> "application/octet-stream" appears with any parameter, it should be
>> treated just like any other MIME type. - We have another change
>> proposal to remove<video>  Content-Type.
>> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit any other
>> alternate Change Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the
>> Proposal Details), in case anyone would like to advocate the status
>> quo or a different change than the specific one in the existing
>> Change Proposals.
>> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by
>> March 3rd, 2011, we proceed to evaluate the change proposal that we
>> have received to date.
>> Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 12:42:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:34 UTC