- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:03:00 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12971
Summary: A lot of times, perhaps the majority of the time,
authors use <em> or <strong> to make text italic or
bold, when in fact the intention has nothing to do
with emphasizing or strongly emphasizing the text. The
result is terrible in aural browsers and extrem
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
Comment:
A lot of times, perhaps the majority of the time, authors use <em> or <strong>
to make text italic or bold, when in fact the intention has nothing to do with
emphasizing or strongly emphasizing the text. The result is terrible in aural
browsers and extremely hard to understand.
Is there any way this practice could be discouraged, other than reintroducing
<i> and <b> which can be ignored by an aural browser?
People just don't understand that <em> doesn't mean italic and <strong>
doesn't mean bold.
Posted from: 70.166.227.119
User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.11
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 17:03:06 UTC