- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:06:02 -0700
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@webconforme.com>, Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
Hi Jirka, On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:46 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote: > On 12.6.2011 3:25, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> Let's get this thread back to focusing on the HTML5 author-only view and what kind of text we may put in its status section, as that is a topic that's actually on-topic here. > > With all due respect, growing divergence between W3C and WHATWG version > of specifications is much larger problem then finding proper wording > about (non)normativeness of author-only view of spec. > > Of course W3C HTML WG has no control over WHATWG spec. But W3C initially > made some deal with WHATWG at the time when HTML development was started > back again at W3C. Also if I'm not mistaken all forming members of > WHATWG are also W3C members. I would still like to hear from these > people what they want to do to stop such divergence or if they are happy > with such divergence. There are many great forums to have that conversation. I'm aware of some recent discussions within the AC and some private discussions going. It also seems like a good general w3c topic, for a list like www-archive. But I'd like to ask that we not overdo it here, beyond what is relevant to the HTML5 author-only draft. Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 12 June 2011 09:06:32 UTC