- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:43:33 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12939
Summary: The <COL> group used to be defined as a very useful to
represent tabular data. Among the various things
needed for tabular data perusing is the data
alignment. In v4.01 there is an "align" and a "char"
attribute that make the <COL> attribute very useful t
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
Comment:
The <COL> group used to be defined as a very useful to represent tabular data.
Among the various things needed for tabular data perusing is the data
alignment.
In v4.01 there is an "align" and a "char" attribute that make the <COL>
attribute very useful to programmers, even if only implemented in MS IE. In
this way a programmer defines the column rendering stuff *once and before* the
data itself gets generated.
Now in v5-draft there's nothing at all, only standard attributes and the span.
In my opinion, the <COL> tags makes very little sense, if any, without the
rendering attributes.
In absence of the rendering attributes in the COL tag, the rendering
instructions need to be repeated on a per table cell basis, thus creating HTML
bloat, useless extra complexity in the document and, finally, a major penalty
in the rendering effectiveness.
Posted from: 151.75.227.170
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.91 Safari/534.30
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2011 08:43:35 UTC