Re: Normative status of author-only view of the HTML5 specification from Jonas Sicking on 2011-06-07 (public-html@w3.org from June 2011)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:48:15 -0700
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=VpEYayN22pEKYpgkUS125RbqUyA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Given that we would then have two documents with normative status describing how HTML is defined. Which of the two is authoritative if the two don't agree?
>
> Our goal is have the two documents agree - the author-only view is generated directly from the HTML5 spec.

That's a great goal, but my question still stands.

/ Jonas

Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 20:55:23 UTC