- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:36:31 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12891
Summary: to RDF conversion should seriously be in agreement
with schema.org?
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: pre-LC1 HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: giovanni.tummarello@deri.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Schema.org using microdata shows an RDF which makes sense (e.g. the URIs are
correctly the same as those poposed on schema.org)see
http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html the RDFa example (just convert it to rdf)
but if the proposed algorithm is used the URIS would be really strange and
incompatible with these.
"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/microdata#http://example.com/a%23:q%20r".
it is really important to fix this algorithm since we do need implementations
asap also driven by schema.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2011 19:36:32 UTC