Re: ISSUE-163 navigating-tracks: Chairs Solicit Change Proposals from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2011-07-07 (public-html@w3.org from July 2011)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:55:43 -0700
To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDMPfbyNdDuG48xcjTZRHWRmu-e9A3nwVMmynkK_C_W9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
> OK, the second is not true. But if you're doing it like this, why bother
> with cues at all? Wouldn't it be cleaner to have *only* a root <nav> with
> possible <nav> children? Using ranges for some chapters and cues for other
> is not very appealing, IMO.

Agreed.  The markup in the wiki is very confusing, imo, since
top-level chapters are indicated in a completely different way from
subchapters.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 18:56:37 UTC