W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Change proposal for HTML WG ISSUE-140: Conformance terminology when applicable specifications are used

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:40:43 -0500
Message-ID: <4D35ECBB.3060903@intertwingly.net>
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
On 01/18/2011 02:14 PM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> I appreciate the attention that the HTML WG has given to ISSUE-140 [1],
> which was opened in response to concerns raised by me. A change proposal
> to resolve this issue is attached. The WG chair (Paul) has informed me
> that submission via email is acceptable, but if you need additional
> information, please let me know

Submission via email to this list is certainly acceptable, but I do 
believe that we need a little more information.

What we are looking for is four items[3].  I believe that what you have 
submitted covers item 3.

I'd recommend sending another email to this list with clearly identified 
responses for all four items.  A link to your posted HTML[4] will 
suffice for item 3.

- Sam Ruby

> The attached HTML file is based on the 14 January 2011 version of the
> common infrastructure editors' draft [2]. I'm not familiar work WG
> conventions for marking up changes, so this uses three simple CSS
> classes (add, del, and comment). You can search for these in the source
> if necessary -- there are only a few changes in any case. I hope this
> ad-hoc markup isn't too inconvenient.
> Again, thank you for your consideration of the issue, and of this change
> proposal. BTW: this proposal is from me, not from the TAG.
> Noah
> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/140
> [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/infrastructure.html


Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 19:41:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:29 UTC