Re: Change proposal for HTML WG ISSUE-140: Conformance terminology when applicable specifications are used

Noah Mendelsohn, Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:15:10 +0000:

> The attached HTML file is based on the 14 January 2011 version of the 
> common infrastructure editors' draft [2].

Hi! The CP says, quote:

]]  Applicable specifications MAY define new document content (e.g. a 
foobar element), MAY prohibit certain otherwise conforming content  [[

Since the HTML5 draft prohibits many previously conforming features - 
especially attributes, many of which user agents nevertheless support, 
it might be a point to also add that applicable specifications as well 
"MAY permit certain otherwise non-conforming content".
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 21:42:17 UTC