Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-118 broken-link-types

On 28.02.2011 23:14, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> Here is the decision. It has been drafted in HTML format to aid readability.
> ...

I think it would be good to clarify which relations will be affected.

It appears that the original CP 
<> was 

	"top", "first", "start", "contents", "ToC" and "index"

while the accepted CP 
mentions to drop:

	"index, up, first, last"

I'm not opposed to drop things from HTML5, in particular when they have 
better definitions elsewhere.

The question of validity will come up again anyway (ISSUE-27).

However, it seems that the accepted proposal suggests not changing a few 
of the relations about what the ISSUE originally was opened; we may have 
to revisit them.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 23:30:43 UTC