- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:11:09 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 02/28/2011 05:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> >>> The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the >>> problem anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I >>> would expect to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually >>> be well-defined again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an >>> improvement to the Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out >>> how one would go about doing that yet.) >> >> Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point? > > No idea. In which case I encourage you (and everybody, for that matter) to ensure that whatever points you feel need to be made here are made (or referenced) by the survey itself. Reminder: this poll closes in just under 6 hours: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-124-objection-poll/ - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 23:11:40 UTC