W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:32:29 +0100
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vqdjkfu664w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:13:25 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0410.html>  
> - it would be nice if the chairs could clarify whether the  
> counter-proposal actually is acceptable - I believe it is not.

It affects the same text. If he wants to make this change what other path  
is there? If someone writes a no-change counter proposal and the WG  
endorses that or endorses your proposal having a later issue remove all  
that text seems disingenuous.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 10:33:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:09 UTC