Re: ISSUE-145 codecs-vs-octet - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

On 03.02.2011 18:04, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> The current status for this issue:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/145
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-145
>
> - We a change proposal to clarify that if "application/octet-stream" appears with any parameter, it should be treated just like any other MIME type.
> - We have another change proposal to remove<video>  Content-Type.
> ...

See <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0410.html> 
- it would be nice if the chairs could clarify whether the 
counter-proposal actually is acceptable - I believe it is not.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:14:05 UTC