RE: Call for a poll of the html wg on removal of hgroup was Re: review of hgroup element prior to last call. from John Foliot on 2011-02-01 (public-html@w3.org from February 2011)

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:16:03 -0800 (PST)
To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "'Steve Faulkner'" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "'Paul Cotton'" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "'HTMLWG WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-ID: <00c201cbc244$78006e90$68014bb0$@edu>

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> That's definitely the case, and we intent to apply the decision policy
> as usual. If the bug report on this ends up escalated to a tracker
> issue, we will treat it as a Last Call issue.  All I'm saying is that
> we do not intend to do anything special outside the bounds of the usual
> process.

Given the scope of the topic being discussed (should <hgroup> remain) it
seems that this is beyond just a simple bug, and so it needs to be
escalated as an issue, then sit back and wait for it to be addressed in
due course - is that correct Maciej?

Steve, do you care to do the honors?

JF

Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:16:36 UTC