W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-131 caret-location-api

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 00:13:55 +1200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=_oOqjmQXwF_Aq4Y05V3Lbd+cgRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 04/30/2011 02:22 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org
>> <mailto:robert@ocallahan.org>> wrote:
>>    As a Mozilla developer, I would not make caret and selection
>>    tracking for canvas a priority until it's clear that discouraging
>>    authors from implementing text editing in canvas has failed.
>> (And even then, we'd have to examine the reasons why authors were
>> insisting on writing text editors in canvas. If it's "because they're
>> boneheads", asking them to use special accessibility APIs is probably
>> pointless.)
> Is the intent of this discussion to reopen the decision?

I'm not asking for that. I was just responding to Richard's question.

As to the final paragraph above, this does not appear to be new information.
>  Instead it appears to be rehashing previous discussions. And furthermore,
> the tone is not appropriate for this mailing list:
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ListGuidelines

I apologize. What is an acceptable synonym for "bonehead" in this context?

"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2011 12:14:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:37 UTC