Re: Bug 11239 from Sam Ruby on 2011-04-29 (public-html@w3.org from April 2011)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:26:52 -0400
To: public-html@w3.org
CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <4DBB1F0C.2080701@intertwingly.net>

On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> I've tried to add a note to this effect.
>
> New patch on the bug:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=981

Specifically:

> +   On platforms where the user agent cannot determine the
> +   blink period and cannot provide a default blink period, the
> +   attribute should return &minus;1.

Rich, is this acceptable?  Can you review the proposed patch and 
identify any other issues that that you might have with this patch?

- Sam Ruby

Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 20:27:16 UTC