- From: Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:16:28 -0700
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
The W3C Document License incorporates the Copyright FAQ by reference: "However, if additional requirements (documented in the Copyright FAQ) are satisfied, the right to create modifications or derivatives is sometimes granted by the W3C to individuals complying with those requirements." See http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231.html. The Copyright FAQ (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-20000620) then says: "See our patent policy FAQ for information about translations and patent commitments." The Patent Policy FAQ: http://www.w3.org/2003/12/22-pp-faq.html. Sort of circular, I admit, and it relies on multiple documents to say similar things, but at least W3C is *trying* to establish a consistent IPR policy relating to copyrights, patents and trademarks. Maybe now that W3C is finally coming to terms with a complete HTML5 licensing policy, we can gather all those references into one IPR document and one IPR FAQ? In the meantime, as I said earlier, I'd be completely satisfied to have W3C's express copyright and patent permission to create any derivative software I want. /Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 4:48 PM > To: Lawrence Rosen > Cc: public-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey > > > On Apr 25, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > > > Maciej Stachowiak asked: > >> Can you cite the extra patent coverage or clarity that the Option 3 > >> license has relative to CC0 or the MIT license? I expect a pointer > >> would be useful to WG members. > > > > I'm being intentionally precise (anal-retentive, as are all lawyers > and > > standards people). Options 1 and 3, for example, include these words: > > > > W3C liability and trademark rules apply. As a whole, this document > > may be used according to the terms of the W3C Document License. > > In addition, to facilitate implementation of the technical > specifications > > set forth in this document, anyone may prepare and distribute > derivative > > works and portions of this document in software, in supporting > materials > > accompanying software, and in documentation of software, PROVIDED > that > > all such works include the notice below.... > > > > This means that there is in overarching license, the W3C Document > License, > > which specifies copyright and patent terms for all W3C documents. *In > > addition*, there is permission to prepare and distribute software > *without > > limiting the software license in any way*. > > I think I need some more help. What are the patent terms specified in > the W3C Document License? I assume this is the W3C Document License in > question: <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents- > 20021231>. > > Regards, > Maciej > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 00:16:50 UTC