- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:25:23 +0000
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> MIT and CC0 are different options. Do you feel that both should be included? If we include these two options should we also include all the other similar license options that the PSIG has previously discussed? I note that the WG was specifically asked to give its opinion on the three candidate licenses in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/html-license-options.html . /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
Received on Saturday, 23 April 2011 00:25:50 UTC