W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

RE: Draft HTML5 licensing survey

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:25:23 +0000
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-ID: <E3EACD022300B94D88613639CF4E25F81A23339D@TK5EX14MBXC132.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> MIT and CC0 are different options. Do you feel that both should be included?

If we include these two options should we also include all the other similar license options that the PSIG has previously discussed?  

I note that the WG was specifically asked to give its opinion on the three candidate licenses in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/html-license-options.html .


Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
Received on Saturday, 23 April 2011 00:25:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:12 UTC