W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-155 table-border

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:18:01 +0200
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Message-ID: <20110418151801678978.5c7e8416@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Leif Halvard Silli, Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:06:03 +0200:
> Sam Ruby, Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:05:43 -0400:
>> In general, there are two basic approaches for dealing with changes 
>> that are found to be inaccurate, incomplete, or go beyond the 
>> decision in ways that are problematic:
>> 1) Agreeing that the change is a reasonable new baseline, and working 
>> with the editor, via discussion and/or bug reports, to refine and 
>> improve the specification.
>> 2) Objecting to a commit on the basis that it doesn't reflect the 
>> decision, and asking that it be reverted.
> I hereby object to the commit. Below follows annotated text from the 
> check-in, [1] to show what I object to:  4 pieces of it is marked up as 

After a battle with myself, a short 'ask around' and thinking about the 
other things we've got to do etc, I've decided to take the other 
approach and accept it as a reasonable baseline. Thus, I withdraw my 
objection to the commit.

Leif H Silli
Received on Monday, 18 April 2011 13:18:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:36 UTC