- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:18:01 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Leif Halvard Silli, Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:06:03 +0200: > Sam Ruby, Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:05:43 -0400: > >> In general, there are two basic approaches for dealing with changes >> that are found to be inaccurate, incomplete, or go beyond the >> decision in ways that are problematic: >> >> 1) Agreeing that the change is a reasonable new baseline, and working >> with the editor, via discussion and/or bug reports, to refine and >> improve the specification. >> >> 2) Objecting to a commit on the basis that it doesn't reflect the >> decision, and asking that it be reverted. > > I hereby object to the commit. Below follows annotated text from the > check-in, [1] to show what I object to: 4 pieces of it is marked up as > <INTOLERABLE>. After a battle with myself, a short 'ask around' and thinking about the other things we've got to do etc, I've decided to take the other approach and accept it as a reasonable baseline. Thus, I withdraw my objection to the commit. Leif H Silli
Received on Monday, 18 April 2011 13:18:34 UTC