- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:16:22 -0500
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, public-html-request@w3.org, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Message-ID: <OFD1262F82.1538821F-ON86257871.0041B211-86257871.0048E874@us.ibm.com>
That is unacceptable and unprofessional. Ian, apparently has carte blanche to write whatever he deems appropriate into the HTML specification yet all other working group members have to go through a formal review process? Ian's editorial comments, if left in, may be considered to reflect the position of all working group members. This is a consensus process and not an Ian process. I would ask that the W3C and chairs of this working group address this immediately. Anyone can view the source of a W3C spec. and see this. Rich Schwerdtfeger CTO Accessibility Software Group From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org> Date: 04/13/2011 04:03 AM Subject: editors comments in the W3C HTML5 specification Sent by: public-html-request@w3.org I don not believe the W3C HTML5 specification is a notebook for Ian to scribble his personal opinions about changes he disagrees with. The W3C HTML5 specification is being littered with comments by the HTML5 editor,, these seem to appear whenever a working group decison does not go his way, for example: [1] <!-- The following paragraph is not included in the WHATWG copy because it is wrong. For example, content models are not syntax. It's also unnecessary. What kinds of things are conformance requirements is explained in the previous section, which talks about RFC 2119. --> [2] <!--(the following is not included in the WHATWG spec for quality reasons)--> [3] <!--(there's no reason to convey <img> elements with alt="" text as images to an AT)--> <!--(none of the following six rows make any sense)--> While i believe it is Ian hicksons right to add whatever comments he likes to his whatwg specification, I do not believe such comments are helpful or useful or correct in the the context of the W3C HTML5 specification. I would ask Ian to remove such comments from the W3C HTML5 specification, if he is unwilling then I ask the chairs advice on how to resolve this issue. [1] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5997&to=5998 [2] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5995&to=5996 [3]http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5995&to=5996 -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 13:17:16 UTC