- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:06:49 +1000
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 22:42 +1000, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> The Media >> Annotations WG have identified a large set of files that have such >> metadata, see http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/#mapping-table >> . This is actually a better list: http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/ > From the mediaont spec itself, it's unclear what kind of products are > expected to implement it. Is the spec expected to apply to browsers in > some way? Use cases are here: http://www.w3.org/TR/media-annot-reqs/ (note: I am not defending or supporting these specs - just mentioning them as further information) >> I was only referring to the abstract concept of encapsulated metadata. > > Well, you named one concrete encapsulation. Correction: Danny named it as an example and I referred to it. (Just being picky. :-) Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 02:07:36 UTC