- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:24:17 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr., Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:06:31 -0700: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> *** Decision of the Working Group *** >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0682.html >> Of the Change Proposals before us, this proposal, with the noted >> exceptions, has drawn the weaker objections. > > I'm confused about this decision from a process perspective. This > decision adopts something that wasn't expressed in any of the Change > Proposals - it's one of the CPs, minus some exceptions. > > In other Decisions, though, similar attempts to provide improved > suggestions in the comments (somebody objects to a CP as written, but > wouldn't object if certain changes were made) have been rejected with > the reason that the decision is purposely limited to choosing between > the submitted change proposals. > > What's the criteria for the decision being limited only to submitted > CPs versus allowing some leeway in synthesizing a decision different > from any of the submitted CPs? FWIW, this decision also adopted a CP with an exception: http://www.w3.org/mid/4D6C5A37.3070704@intertwingly.net -- leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 00:24:50 UTC