- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:01:41 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > A further comment. It seems that one of the points of disagreement is > over how this text in the Change Proposal is to be interpreted: > > * H1 to H6 allowed roles: button, checkbox, link, menuitem, > menuitemcheckbox, menuitemradio, option, presentation, radio, slider, > spinbutton, scrollbar, tab or treeitem. > > This doesn't mention a default role, unlike the text for "h1 to h6 > element that does have an hgroup ancestor". One could plausibly > interpret this as: > > (a) Change h1-h6 to have no default role > (b) Make no changes to default role for h1-h6 > > From the test alone, it is not completely clear which was intended. From > your statements, it seems that your intent was (b). And it seems that > Ian agrees that (b) would have been a technically superior choice. (b) would be self-contradictory (making the default non-conforming). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 21:02:28 UTC