- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:30:11 -0400
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On 04/08/2011 05:56 AM, James Graham wrote: > > I thought that was the reason for *URIs*, not prefixes. The bug[1] was opened eighteen months ago. The issue[2] six months ago. The call for proposals[3] was four months ago. The survey[4] was one month ago. James, if your goal is to get this working group to repeat the same discussions over and over, the job of the chairs is an easy one: we will simply shut the discussion down. We will get you an answer on your question of what would constitute new information next week[5]. Until then, I ask you to focus just on one question: what would constitute new information in the context of this issue? - Sam Ruby [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/120 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Dec/0065.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0255.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0166.html
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 11:30:53 UTC