- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:26:44 +0300
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 22:44 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 02.04.2011 03:34, Edward O'Connor wrote: > > ... > >> This comparison also doesn't reflect the fact that the IANA registry > >> has only been open for a couple of months. The expert review process > >> takes time, and given time the IANA registry is likely to catch up in > >> reflecting reality, and perhaps overtake the microformats wiki. > > > > As we have seen in the past couple of months since your email, the IANA > > registry hasn't caught up to the existing-rel-values page of the > > Microformats wiki. For instance, it still doesn't document rel=pingback. > > ... > > Because we haven't got a spec that the designated experts (including > myself) consider stable enough; note that this affect both content and > location. This is ridiculous. The pingback spec has been stable in terms of both content and location since 2002. I think this should be treated as evidence that the procedures at IANA (as implemented by the current Designated Experts at least) don't work. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 09:27:15 UTC