- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:02:44 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12432
Summary: Would it be fair to say that making html5
documentation available in a convenient compressed
archive would not be such a difficult task for a great
big organization like w3c? And wouldn't it also be
fair to say that even the famous w3c has a lame web
serv
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/Overview.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
Comment:
Would it be fair to say that making html5 documentation available in a
convenient compressed archive would not be such a difficult task for a great
big organization like w3c?
And wouldn't it also be fair to say that even the famous w3c has a lame web
server content that cannot even detect the presence of javascript in a
standard browsewr such as SeaMonkey? Shame on w3c!
Posted from: 27.33.225.88
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 04:02:46 UTC