Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-32 table-summary

On 04/05/2011 01:32 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Sam Ruby, Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:19:14 -0400:
> This re-poll came as a surprise.

The announcement was made in the same manner as all of the other polls:

> Didn't you make a decision after the
> previous poll? I believed you did


> and that the addition of the summary
> element CP could not result in radically new results, unless you chose
> to support the element proposal.

The addition of the summary element CP did not produce a different 
result.  The objection that was found to be the strongest was entered in 
response to the first poll.

- Sam Ruby

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 17:51:02 UTC