- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:16:07 +0200
- To: Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- CC: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 04.04.2011 19:08, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote: > > On 04/04/2011, at 5:54 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> On 04.04.2011 18:20, mike amundsen wrote: >>> <snip> >>>> The tricky question is: how does the server know that a PUT was the result >>>> of a form submission? >>> </snip> >>> >>> Why would this be of interest to the server? >>> ... >> >> ...in order to decide whether to return a payload to the UA for display? >> >> Again, I don't believe Accept: helps here; it's not a question of media type, but of the client's intent. >> >> BR, Julian > > The client's intent is framed by the entire request - URI, headers& body, Accept is part of that intent. > > If the UA doesn't specify an Accept i would infer that the intent was they it didn't want\couldn't handle any content. If the UA does specify an Accept, i would infer that it is intending to receive content - for that request. That UAs send Accept with every request just means that they want content in every response, IMO - specifications or real world will most certainly vary. <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-13.html#rfc.section.6.1.p.9>: "If no Accept header field is present, then it is assumed that the client accepts all media types. If an Accept header field is present, and if the server cannot send a response which is acceptable according to the combined Accept field value, then the server SHOULD send a 406 (Not Acceptable) response." Please let's stick with what spec says :-) Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 17:16:43 UTC