Re: [Licensing] Request to evaluate candidate HTML Document license (known as "Option 3")

On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> 
> Given that uncertainty, presumably engendered by the fact that the issue 
> has never been tested in a case, I believe we (Mozilla) are 
> intentionally picking the "no surprises" side of the legal controversy.  
> That is, we would vastly prefer it if our goals for the license were met 
> no matter which side of the legal argument is correct.

This is Google's position too, FWIW.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 06:04:09 UTC