Re: CfC: Publish eight heartbeat drafts as FPWDs

Maciej Stachowiak, Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:02:47 -0700:
> On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Sam Ruby, Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:35:42 -0400:
>>> On 09/15/2010 10:56 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

>> I object to publishing the HTML5 spec and the Differences spec. 

> The _vendor- mechanism existed in our previous heartbeat draft, 
> published June 24: <>. So 
> it does not seem like a very good reason to hold publication on our 
> new heartbeat round.

Some formalism:

Ian's zero-edit proposal was the official Zero-Edit proposal until the 
chairs rejected it on 8th of September [#].  And the only thing Ian 
says in that proposal is that the need for a vendor prefix solution 
"corresponds to an open bug". [*] Also, although you rejected his 
proposal, you did not point out that there was no open bug anymore.


There were thus little reason for the group to believe that this issue 
had been solved. 
leif halvard silli

Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 21:24:42 UTC