- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:39:58 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, nathan@webr3.org, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 24 Sep 2010, at 08:25, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 24.09.2010 01:08, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 09/23/2010 06:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 23.09.2010 22:04, Ian Hickson wrote: >>>> ... >>>> what their position is on adding this to new features). IMHO there's >>>> not really much point discussing features that browser vendors aren't >>>> willing to implement. >>>> ... >>> >>> Are you saying that for this use case, browser vendors are more >>> important like, for instance, search engines? >> >> Julian: can you convert this statement into one that points out a >> specific feature of HTML5 that breaks, for example, search engines? > > No. It was just a reply to the claim that browsers are the only HTML consumers of importance. I don't see any such claim in the quoted text. Do browsers /need/ to "the only HTML consumers of importance" for their refusal to implement a particular syntax for metadata to make it a non-starter? If we're going to bother to add metadata to documents, don't we want browsers (as well as search engines) to be able to extract and present that data to users? For example, if I was using a citation vocabulary, I'd want people to be able to write browsers with built-in features like Zotero: http://www.zotero.org/ to extract my citations, or at least to be able to write browsers with APIs that made it easier to write such add-ons. Browsers are certainly not the only important consumer. But I think they are a *critical* consumer. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 08:43:58 UTC