ISSUE-119 (Certain relationships take on a special meaning when repeated; other solutions may be cleaner)


this currently says "raised by Julian Reschke", but in fact it was 
raised by Maciej, based on a Bugzilla issue I did open earlier on.

That would be a nit, if the description actually expressed my concern. 
It currently says:

"...The scope of this issue is to propose approaches for the relation 
types currently indicated by repetition..."

No, that's not the scope I had in mind when I opened 

The objective is to restore the old semantics of link relations in 
general, and "up" specifically, and, to be consistent with other formats 
that use link relations.

Finding an alternate solution for the use case for which the new 
semantics was added is a completely orthogonal problem that should be 
handled separately.

Maciej, are you ok with me updating the description accordingly? 
Otherwise, let's set the "raised by" field to your name.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Saturday, 18 September 2010 08:58:00 UTC