W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:07:23 -0400
Message-ID: <4C87989B.3080002@intertwingly.net>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/17/2010 03:36 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> I have created another proposal, with Rob's proposal as starting point:
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/html:xmlns

The chairs have reviewed this proposal, and determined that it does not 
meet the standards for a Change Proposal.

In particular, it not meet the standard for proposal details.  Partially 
this is simply wording, e.g. "However, this proposal suggests ...might 
be".  More importantly, this proposal does not contain sufficient enough 
detail for the editor to apply the proposal without ambiguity.  See the 
decision policy[1] for requirements, and the extensionslikesvg[2] 
proposal for an example.

Additionally, this proposal could benefit from making the rationale more 
clear.  It is possible that this could simply be done by copying 
portions of the positive effects into the rationale.

The summary and impacts sections were found to meet requirements.

Be advised that if a revised change proposal addressing these issues is 
not provided by 22 September, there is a significant possibility that 
this proposal will be eliminated from further consideration.

- Sam Ruby, on behalf of the three co-chairs

[2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/extensionslikesvg
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 14:07:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:23 UTC