Re: Report on testing of the link relations registry

On 04.09.2010 01:54, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> ...
>> But much of the criticism of the registries has been off the mark, I think.  Registries do what they are asked to do; some community decides what the entrance/review criteria area, what needs to be documented, and so on, and then the registry helps keep the resulting database and to apply the agreed rules.  I think that much of this discussion has the feel of setting up strawmen and then coming to conclusions based on those strawmen.
>
> Right, registries are just fine.  The problem here is that the
> suggested registry isn't producing good results, for various reasons.
> ...

Yet.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Saturday, 4 September 2010 07:25:38 UTC