- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:27:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, L. David Baron wrote: > > I don't think we should standardize every browser maker's failed (due to > lack of adoption) experiments at feature additions just because the > browser maker won't remove them. I agree, but the question is whether in this case there really is a lack of adoption (in content), or whether on the contrary, non-IE browsers are being disadvantaged because they don't support this feature. I agree that if the content using this is insignificant, that we should drop the feature, but then why would Microsoft not want to simplify their code and drop it also? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 18:28:21 UTC