Here's a suggested slight tweak to the warning wording, to highlight the fact that the Editor's Draft may have additional bug fixes, which seems like the key thing we are trying to convey to implementors. Any objections to this version? --------- "This is a work in progress! For the latest updates from the HTML WG, possibly including important bug fixes, please look at the <a>editor's draft</a> instead." --------- Regards, Maciej On Oct 28, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:19:43 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>>> >>>> Anyway, now that it has been brought up - what do you think of the >>>> warning box in the recently published Navigation Timing Working Draft: >>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-navigation-timing-20101026/>? >>> >>> I think it needs to be significantly more prominent; in particular, I >>> think it should be visible at all times. Most people don't see the status >>> section, especially if they just followed a link deep into the multipage >>> version. >> >> Yeah, can't believe how many times our engineers get tripped up by this. Pretty clear that the age of bookmarks is over and people just search and follow the first hit -- which often is the wrong one in case of standards, but that is not made clear. >> > > Let's continue discussion of the details in the warning in a separate subthread (changed topic). > > Regards, > Maciej >
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 00:46:48 UTC