- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:01:45 +0200
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, "'Michael(tm) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, 'Philippe Le Hegaret' <plh@w3.org>, 'Judy Brewer' <jbrewer@w3.org>, jeff@w3.org
On 27.10.2010 20:42, John Foliot wrote: > Chairs, > > I must strenuously protest that today the official W3C Editor's Draft > Specification (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/) is currently pointing to the > WHATWG specification, which includes a number of items that are > specifically *NOT* included in the W3C Draft, including the addition of > Microdata (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#microdata) > and references to WebSRT > (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#websrt-cue-text-render > ing-rules) - a format in particular that the Accessibility Task Force > media sub-team have been persistent and explicit in ensuring *NOT* be > added to the Draft Specification at this time. > > I personally would rather see a black 404 page than to have the W3C > pointing to this document, which does not reflect the W3C specification > nor it's consensus based approach. At the very least, it should point to > the most current W3C Working Draft at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-html5-20100624/ > > When specifically can we expect this to be corrected? > > JF --> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11153> (So Sam doesn't need to advise us to raise bugs :-) Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 21:02:28 UTC