- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:10:44 -0400
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- CC: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/14/2010 03:16 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 10/14/2010 03:05 PM, Cynthia Shelly wrote: >> I have a question for the chairs about the survey on Issues 74 and 105 >> with respect to issue 131. >> >> As I understand the issues, question #4 on the survey [1], “Objections >> to adding advisory text explaining how to use the focus rect API for >> efficient caret position notification, and change nothing else?” is a >> counter-proposal to the proposal covered in 131 [2] to add a caret API >> and focus rectangle handling. It seems odd to me to survey question 4 >> now, while deferring the proposal it counters. Perhaps we should include >> question 4 in issue 131 and remove it from the current survey? > > Anybody object to me taking question 4 off of the survey and > incorporating it into the resolution of issue 131? Hearing no objections, we will remove question 4 from consideration, and incorporate this question into the resolution of issue-131. >> Thanks, >> >> Cynthia >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/ >> [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 > > - Sam Ruby - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 13:11:21 UTC