- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:05:31 +0000
- To: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 19:06:41 UTC
I have a question for the chairs about the survey on Issues 74 and 105 with respect to issue 131. As I understand the issues, question #4 on the survey [1], "Objections to adding advisory text explaining how to use the focus rect API for efficient caret position notification, and change nothing else?" is a counter-proposal to the proposal covered in 131 [2] to add a caret API and focus rectangle handling. It seems odd to me to survey question 4 now, while deferring the proposal it counters. Perhaps we should include question 4 in issue 131 and remove it from the current survey? Thanks, Cynthia [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/ [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 19:06:41 UTC