- From: Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:32:54 +0000
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Based on the latest recommendations in bug 10152 [1], the section now reads as follows: [] 7.2 Language Attributes When using language attributes, polyglot markup must use both the lang and xml:lang attributes. Neither attribute is to be used without the other, and the values for both lang and xml:lang must be the same. Polyglot markup should use the language attributes in the html element to set the default language for the document. [] I believe this satisfies the issues in this bug and I have resolved the bug as FIXED. Thanks for your help and patience. Eliot [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10152 > -----Original Message----- > From: Eliot Graff > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:52 PM > To: 'Leif Halvard Silli'; Richard Ishida > Cc: public-html@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org > Subject: RE: i18n Polyglot Markup/xml:lang+lang (5th issue) > > I've added section 7.2, Language Attributes, to the polyglot spec. It reads: > > ]] > 7.2 Language Attributes > > Polyglot markup should use the language attributes in the html element to > set the default language for the document. > > When using language attributes, polyglot markup must use both the lang and > xml:lang attributes. Neither attribute is to be used without the other. > [[ > > > > I am confused about one point. Bug 10152 [1] says: > > ]] > mention that the meta Content-Language element has no usefulness at all in > XML for setting the language of content. > [[ > > But Leif makes this point > > > Are there reasons to say anything special about http- > > equiv="Content-language" with regard to Polyglot Markup? Based on my > > previous testing, then all the dominating browser engines behave > > exactly the same way with regard to both http-equiv="Content-Language" > > and lang/xml:lang, regardless of XHTML or HTML parsing is used. So I > > think not. > > -- > > leif halvard silli > > Richard or Leif, > > Can either of you (or anyone else) point me to a resource that might decide > this? > > Thanks, > > Eliot > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10152
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 19:33:32 UTC