W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: i18n comments on Polyglot Markup [issue #4]

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com>
Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <1697542661.114948.1286193172717.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
> In
> addition, the meta tag may be used in the absence of a BOM as long as
> it matches the already specified encoding. Note that the W3C
> Internationalization (i18n) Group recommends to always include a
> visible encoding declaration in a document, because it helps
> developers, testers, or translation production managers to check the
> encoding of a document visually.

I object to the polyglot markup doc saying that things are permitted when HTML5 says they aren't permitted. HTML5 doesn't permit <meta charset="UTF-16">. If the i18n group wishes to change that, the procedurally proper way is to escalate http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 once it has been WONTFIXed (and I expect it to be WONTFIXed)--not to try to get the polyglot markup doc changed ahead of the spec.

(Of course, I'd prefer http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10890 to be WONTFIXed and the i18n group not escalating it.)

Henri Sivonen
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 11:54:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:05 UTC