W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Media Fragments URI specification and HTML5: call for review

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:58:41 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBrsQJaR1=+MM84yF0mfuW9K8S9WYNa4uqKaR3@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Cc: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Wrong link, sorry: http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/

Silvia.

2010/11/24 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>:
> Raphael asked me to forward this request for review from the Media
> Fragments WG to this mailing list, since he had problems posting.
> (It's probably good that it's not cross-posted to whatwg and
> public-html anyway.)
>
> Have a read of http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-media-frags-20100408 and
> see if it's sane.
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
> Date: 2010/11/24
> Subject: [whatwg] Media Fragments URI specification and HTML5: call for review
> To: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, whatwg@whatwg.org
> Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Erik Mannens
> <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
>
>
> Dear Mike, HTML5,
>
> The Media Fragments WG has issued a Last Call WD a couple of month ago
> and would welcome comments from the HTML WG on its entire
> specification "Media Fragments URI 1.0" located at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-media-frags-20100408. If you plan to send
> comments, please let us know and do send your comments to
> <public-media-fragment@w3.org> with "LC Comment" in the subject.
>
> Furthermore, following the coffee discussion Mike and I had 2 weeks
> ago at TPAC, I point you to this bug entered in the HTML5 bug tracker:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 "support for media
> fragment URIs in relevant HTML5 elements".
>
> This bug describes the particular problem of rendering spatial media
> fragment in a HTML browser. The Media Fragments WG has written this
> non normative paragraph [1]:
>
> "For a spatial URI fragment, we foresee two distinct use cases:
> highlighting the spatial region in-context and cropping to the region.
> In the first case, the spatial region could be indicated by means of a
> bounding box or the background (i.e., all the pixels that are not
> contained within the region) could be blurred or darkened. In the
> second case, the region alone would be presented as a cropped area.
> How a document author specifies which use case is intended is outside
> the scope of this specification, we suggest implementors of the
> specification provide a means for this, for example through attributes
> or stylesheet elements."
>
> We will start discussing with the CSS WG how this styling could be
> done but the Media Fragments WG also thinks that if a default behavior
> must be specified, it should happen in the HTML5 specification.
> Best regards.
>
> †Erik & RaphaŽl
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#media-fragment-display
>
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> 2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 12:59:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:27 UTC