W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-125

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:43:18 +0100
Message-ID: <4CDFCB56.4050008@gmx.de>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 14.11.2010 05:15, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> The best solution to a whole group of problems here is IMHO to define
> that<meta http-equiv>  has no relation to HTTP headers at all. Any and
> all similarities with http and http headers is a historical artifact.
> ...

If that's what we think, we should clearly say that.

That would mean clarifying that the section is *only* about 
meta/@http-equiv, and clearly state that *because* it's not about the 
HTTP header field the parsing rules can vary.

That being said: even if we do that it would be good to reduce 
*unnecessary* deviations. For instance, it's totally not clear why 
"foocharset" is parsed as "charset", while "charsetfoo" is not 

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 14 November 2010 11:44:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:27 UTC