- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:46:53 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On 11/10/2010 08:36 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 10.11.2010 14:30, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 11/10/2010 08:27 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 10.11.2010 14:16, Sam Ruby wrote: >>>> The HTML WG Chairs are evaluating the status of the current three >>>> different ISSUE-27: rel-ownership change proposals. See: >>>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-027 >>>> >>>> Before the Chairs issue a survey on this issue we would like to ensure >>>> that there is AT LEAST one "advocate" in the WG for each of the three >>>> change proposals. If there are NO advocates for one or more of the >>>> proposals then the Chairs propose to drop that change proposal from the >>>> eventual WG survey on Issue-27 since we believe that will greatly >>>> simplify the survey and the results processing. >>>> >>>> Please reply to this email if you are an advocate FOR one or more of >>>> the >>>> following change proposals with a clear indication of which proposal(s) >>>> you support: >>>> >>>> 1. Change Proposal: Replace Wiki-Based Link Relation Registry with IANA >>>> registry proposed by "Web Linking" draft >>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/1006.html >>>> ... >>> >>> Me. >>> >>> Note that the change proposal originated from Mark Nottingham; I'm not >>> sure whether it should be updated before a poll (reflecting publication >>> of RFC 5988, supporting web sites, and initial registrations), though. >> >> Just be aware: we only intend to survey and evaluate proposals which >> actually are received. > > Yes, but on the other hand all counter proposals were received after the > deadline. > > So I think it would be fair to actually allow Mark to look at the CP and > consider whether it needs an update. Fair enough: I wasn't clear. All I was trying to express is the sentiment that if we don't get an update, we will proceed with what we have. If we get an update before we proceed to a survey, we will evaluate whether or not to include it in the survey. > Best regards, Julian - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 13:47:24 UTC